Canon EOS 5D Mark II review Part 1

This camera can do most of the things the 1D can, but it will never achieve the same quality as a professional camera such as the 1Ds in low light condition because the noise is a lot more in this camera (5d mk II) than the 1Ds. You are comparing it to the 1D which indeed is way faster than this one, but check out the specs for the 1Ds Mk III. The place where i work at, they use all cameras 1Ds Mk III and they use the 5D as a back up.

it’s for beginner photographers because when you are into photography as a professional, you wouldn’t want to use a 5d mk Ii but a canon 1Ds Mk III or a nikon such as the D3X for “professional” quality, specially if you are shooting in low light conditions.

saying all of this i still prefere the phots of canon digitals…i have not got the same colour quality when since using nikon…but colour quality is nothing if you cant get the picture you want because the control isnt there.

peace

Brian

i would love to hear your opinion instead of just “im saying”

well why then? justify your statements otherwise its just nonsense…its like everyone on youtube are walking adverts parroting slogans without any thought process.

Ill explain what i think disprove me if you want

their cameras to me feel like they where not meant for human hands the four rows of buttons controlling iso wb etc are indistinguishable without looking you cant turn it off without moving you face off the camera, the af is stone age …

im saying lol